In the quick video, I take a look at the interface of both software and speed and edit the above image to see the relative differences and the handling of the Fuji files, which is apparent from the outset. I am preferring the final outcome due to the starting point of the raw files. With the edits I've completed so far in Capture One. Yes, it may not have the same cataloging or file management facilities, but as I'm still learning my way around it, the sessions seem to be the way for me to go, but perhaps there's a better option I've still to discover.įrom the outset, the color and sharpness handling is very apparent when put side by side with the Lightroom edit, and understandably, I tackled the edits slightly differently due to this. If this is the starting point for an edit, sometimes, the result can be a little disappointing, although that is not always the case.Īs a new user when it comes to Capture One, I can see why some claim it has a steeper learning curve for newbies, but if you are already a Lightroom user, it's not too dissimilar in terms of layout and usability. This is not always the case and is only really noticeable when zoomed to 100%. However, one of my main criticisms is its handling of Fuji files, as it appears to produce a slightly soft smearing effect. The interface is intuitive and now very familiar, plus it's also easy to navigate and learn and integrates seamlessly with Photoshop and the plugins I use. Lightroom has been my go-to software for editing all of my raw files for Fuji and Nikon. Inspired by Ivor Rackham's recent article, Lightroom Versus ON1 Photo Raw 2023, I decided to test out the differences in the handling of the Fuji files to see what software would best suit my purposes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |